Compare
Postil vs Qodo
Qodo (formerly Codium) is the one major competitor with a genuine self-hosting story, through its open-source PR-Agent. Postil is a Qodo alternative for teams who want the self-hostable thing to be the whole product, priced by active private-PR author instead of through pooled credit packs, with a merge gate you can require in branch protection.
| Capability | Postil | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Hard merge gate (separate blocking check) | ||
| Published silence / quiet-rate metric | ||
| Pricing | Per active private-PR author; 30-day hosted trial | Credit packs; $0.012/credit, $30 start |
| Self-host without enterprise sales | ||
| BYOK and local models (Ollama) | ||
| Platforms | GitHub App: GitHub. CLI/CI: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket + Azure DevOps on a best-effort CI gate | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps; PR-Agent adds Gitea, CodeCommit |
Hard merge gate (separate blocking check)
- Postil
Yes. postil/gate, fail-closed
- Qodo
No. no separable blocking check
Published silence / quiet-rate metric
- Postil
Yes. headline dashboard number
- Qodo
no
Pricing
- Postil
- Per active private-PR author; 30-day hosted trial
- Qodo
- Credit packs; $0.012/credit, $30 start
Self-host without enterprise sales
- Postil
Yes. free, Docker Compose; same product as hosted
- Qodo
Yes. via open-source PR-Agent (Apache-2.0)
BYOK and local models (Ollama)
- Postil
Yes. GitHub App, CLI/CI, and self-hosted
- Qodo
Partial. via open-source PR-Agent
Platforms
- Postil
- GitHub App: GitHub. CLI/CI: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket + Azure DevOps on a best-effort CI gate
- Qodo
- GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps; PR-Agent adds Gitea, CodeCommit
Sources: Qodo public pricing and usage docs, plus vendor public docs.
Credit where due: PR-Agent is real self-hosting
PR-Agent is open source (Apache-2.0), runs with your own key, and supports local models through Ollama, including air-gapped setups. Among the major vendors it is the credible answer for teams that cannot send code to an external API, and we say so plainly. The difference is what you get: PR-Agent is a separate open-source tool, while Qodo Pro Team is its hosted product with its own credit system. Self-hosted Postil is the same product as hosted Postil, gate, silence metric, dashboard and all, via Docker Compose with OpenRouter, Azure, and Ollama examples.
Credit packs are still a usage meter
Qodo Pro Team is credit-pack based: public pricing shows a $30 starting point, pooled credits at $0.012 per credit, and self-serve designed for up to 30 users. Its usage docs describe shared workspace credits and overage caps. Postil prices BYOK by active author, with provider usage billed directly. Hosted starts with a 30-day trial. See the pricing details.
A gate you can require
Postil separates enforcement from commentary: postil/gate is a real check you can require in branch protection, failing only at or above your configured severity, while postil/review carries everything advisory. On operational errors the gate fails closed by default; repos can opt into gate.onError: advisory, which fails open on provider outages only. Qodo's public materials describe review automation but do not document a separate branch-protection check equivalent to Postil's gate.
Practitioner-reported noise, and Postil's own numbers
Practitioner sentiment has bundled Qodo into the category's noise complaints: one founder reported CodeRabbit and Qodo "at best added noise to PRs, at worst flagged false positives". Qodo's own benchmark ranks Qodo first, a pattern shared by every vendor benchmark in the category. Postil does not publish a benchmark where it wins. It publishes a silence rate, the share of PRs where it said nothing, as the first number on the dashboard, with the confidence distribution of every finding it did ship.
Where Qodo is ahead
Qodo's hosted platform coverage is broad (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps), PR-Agent extends it further (Gitea, AWS CodeCommit), and its enterprise tier offers on-prem and air-gapped deployment with a SOC 2 Type II posture. The PR-Agent community is large and established. If you want an open-source reviewer with years of contributors behind it, PR-Agent is the incumbent and a fair default.
One product, clear pricing.
Private plans are priced by active author. Self-hosted is free with the same gate and dashboard. Hosted starts with a 30-day trial.